The perfect curves don’t always mean the biggest possible bust or the widest possible hips. True hourglass harmony is about balance, projection, and how the figure presents itself in motion, clothing, and photographs. This case study follows a real woman we worked with, who started with a naturally feminine frame but lacked the sharpness and explosive visual impact that separates “pretty” from unforgettable.
At 173 cm tall (5’8”), she had natural curves and proportionate hips but a bust that read smaller than it measured and glutes that lacked upper pole projection. Despite a true 32C/small D cup and hips around 96–97 cm, her figure didn’t register as sculpted because the bust volume dispersed outward and the glutes carried a soft, vertical shape. Our goal: to refine her figure with a focus on explosive cleavage and sculpted, bouncy glutes that harmonized with her taller frame.
This 4,000-word case study details the exact strategy we used, why we prioritized the bust first, and how the glute plan elevated her from “nice figure” to a true hourglass with commanding presence.
Chapter 1: Understanding the Starting Point
Bust Analysis (Before)
Her bust measured 91 cm over an 80 cm underbust, placing her at a 32C to small 32D. On paper, this is not a small bust, but in reality, it read flatter than expected. Why?
- Wider breast roots: The breast tissue began further apart at the sternum, softening cleavage lines.
- Upper pole flattening: Without support, the top half of the bust lacked volume, creating a teardrop slope.
- Soft but dispersed tissue: Crop tops and tension dresses flattened the bust; the tissue didn’t “stack” upward into the neckline.
The result was a bust that required heavy push-up bras to show cleavage and disappeared visually in braless clothing. Even in fitted dresses, the bust looked more stable than explosive.
Glute Analysis (Before)
The glutes were feminine but lacked dominance. At 96–97 cm, the hips were proportionate to the bust and waist (72 cm), but the overall profile lacked projection.
- Vertical cheek shape: The lower pole of the glutes carried most of the volume, while the upper pole sat flatter.
- Hip dips: A slight indentation on the outer hips interrupted the hourglass flow.
- Soft tissue: The glutes were pliable and feminine but didn’t have a strong shelf or bounce.
This combination meant that the hips didn’t read as wide or sculpted, and the butt didn’t project backward dramatically from the waistline.
Chapter 2: Bust Transformation Strategy
The Goal: Explosive Cleavage
Our bust strategy wasn’t about chasing the largest cup size possible. We wanted central stacking, upper pole swelling, and cleavage that commanded attention in any scenario—braless, in tension dresses, and in Bombshell bras.
Explosive cleavage is the term we use for breasts that:
- Stack tightly at the sternum, creating deep, vertical cleavage.
- Project forward rather than spreading outward.
- Surge upward into necklines with upper pole fullness.
- Maintain a “pillow” effect without spilling over.
Step 1: Fat Transfer for Root Narrowing & Upper Pole Fullness
We used autologous fat transfer to address the root width and upper pole collapse. Approximately 250–300 cc of grafted fat per breast was harvested from the waistline and inner thighs. Placement was strategic:
- Upper pole (60%): Added swelling and roundness at the top of the bust.
- Medial quadrant (30%): Narrowed the roots and improved central stacking.
- Lower pole (10%): Smoothed the teardrop line for a natural curve.
By narrowing the roots, we effectively reduced the breast gap and set the stage for true cleavage braless.
Step 2: Stop at Full D / Small DD
Going larger than a full 32D/small DD would have created outward spillage and less compact stacking. By capping the size at 95 cm over an 80 cm underbust (32DD), we achieved a bust that looked elegant braless and explosive when styled.
This decision preserved hourglass balance. A 32DDD would have added bulk without improving central cleavage depth, especially on a taller frame.
Step 3: Optimize Braless and Bombshell Looks
Post-transfer, the bust now presented 85–90% explosive cleavage braless in tension clothing: a deep central line, upper pole swell, and a compact silhouette.
In Bombshell bras (adding apparent +2 cup sizes), the bust doubled visually, appearing as a 32G without any side spillage. The breasts stacked like liquid pillows, rising into the cups and creating a magnetic neckline.
Bust Outcome
Measurements: 95 cm bust / 69 cm waist / 101 cm hips
Cup Size: 32DD (apparent G in Bombshell)
The bust now read sharp and powerful in every scenario:
- Braless tension dresses: Central cleavage visible without effort.
- Push-up bras: Apparent DDD with vertical cleavage.
- Bombshell bras: Apparent G cup, stacked and explosive.
Chapter 3: Glute Transformation Strategy
The Goal: Sculpted Projection & Bounce
The glute strategy complemented the bust by creating a stronger shelf and more dynamic movement. We didn’t want rigid, “obvious” glutes. Instead, we wanted sculpted but soft tissue that projected backward, smoothed hip dips, and moved naturally.
Step 1: Fat Transfer for Projection and Hip Dip Fill
We harvested fat from the waistline (which also tightened the waist for contrast) and grafted it into three key zones:
- Upper pole (50%): Lifted the butt higher and created a shelf.
- Hip dips (30%): Smoothed outer hip curves for a continuous hourglass line.
- Lower pole (20%): Enhanced bounce and lower roundness.
Post-graft, the hips measured 101 cm, but the waist reduction (69 cm) sharpened the waist-to-hip ratio to 0.68, an elite hourglass proportion.
Step 2: Maintain Soft Tissue
We avoided over-firming the glutes. Unlike augmented or over-trained glutes, which can look rigid, her glutes stayed soft and pliable. This created the “bounce” that makes movement more sensual and prevents the butt from looking surgically obvious.
Step 3: Enhance Clothing and Bikini Effects
The upgraded upper pole and hip curves meant that cheeky bikinis and high-cut leggings now sat higher on the glute shelf, creating glute cleavage—a doubling effect where the cheeks appear separated and fuller.
From the rear, the glutes now appeared almost twice the size, not by sheer volume but by lift, shape, and central cleavage.
Glute Outcome
Measurements: 95 – 69 – 101 cm
- Continuous hourglass outer curve (hip dips eliminated)
- Upper pole shelf that projected backward, visible even in loose clothing
- Central glute cleavage in cheeky bikinis or leggings, doubling the apparent size
Chapter 4: Hourglass Harmony
The bust and glutes now harmonized beautifully. The bust, upgraded to a small DD, commanded presence up top with explosive cleavage. The glutes, lifted and sculpted, balanced the bust without overpowering it.
Bust vs. Butt Balance:
- Braless tension dresses: Bust and glutes read as equal features.
- Bombshell bras + leggings: Bust surged visually with central stacking, matching the glute presence.
- Jeans and t-shirts: Glutes projected softly from the waistline, while the bust maintained a natural but defined profile.
Chapter 5: Lessons from This Transformation
- Bigger isn’t always better: Stopping the bust at full D/small DD preserved explosive cleavage and prevented a top-heavy silhouette.
- Root narrowing is everything: Narrow roots + upper pole fullness = explosive cleavage.
- Projection > circumference: Glute projection and upper pole lift make the hips and butt appear larger without unnecessary volume.
- Soft tissue wins: Both bust and glutes stayed soft and pliable, giving natural movement and elegance.
The Result
- Measurements: 95 – 69 – 101 cm
- Bust Apparent Size: DD braless / apparent G in Bombshell
- Explosive Cleavage: Present braless (8.5/10), commanding in Bombshell (9.5/10)
- Glutes: Shelf projection, hip dip elimination, soft bounce
This transformation elevated her from a figure that “looked fine” into one that radiated hourglass harmony and explosive feminine presence.
Next Steps
If you want to create a similar result, start with the bust first. Focus on root narrowing and upper pole fullness, and don’t max out volume. Once the bust is balanced, move to the glutes, sculpting projection and hip width to match the upper body.
The key metric isn’t size — it’s explosive energy.
If you want, I can also tighten the language in this while keeping all the technical details, so it reads faster but still keeps the clinical precision. Would you like me to do that next?
Need a break?
You’ve chatted a lot today – is this a good time to pause for a break?